AVA brings the discipline of a senior analyst to every alert. Hypothesis-driven triage, tested against your environment, ending in a verdict your team can defend — true positive, false positive, or a precise specification of what evidence is still missing. Forensic-grade. Audit-ready. Defensible by construction.
The SOC market has spent a decade arguing about detection sensitivity and automation throughput. AVA is in a third category — the one most products skip — where evidence is gathered, hypotheses are tested, and a verdict gets made.
SIEM and XDR rules surface events. Volume is the metric. False-positive density is the consequence. The decision is still pending.
SOAR runs the steps an analyst already wrote. Speed is the metric. Coverage is bounded by the playbook library. Judgment is still pending.
AVA gathers evidence, tests hypotheses against your environment, and returns a verdict your team can defend. Discipline is the metric. The decision arrives with the alert.
Including a third verdict — INCONCLUSIVE — when the evidence won't support a conclusion: AVA says so, and names exactly what's missing.
Read the third verdict → Where AVA livesLLMs are built for conversation, not statistical truth — left alone, they talk themselves into false certainty. PEBRE splits the work: AVA's agents extract the evidence; PEBRE weighs it, the way forensic reasoning weighs competing explanations. The verdict is backed by measured evidence, with an audit trail you can trace.
Every alert produces one — the verdict, the evidence beneath it, the reasoning that connects them, the gaps that bound it.
We don't quote inflated MTTR figures. Each number is labelled — observed in deployment, modelled, or an architectural commitment.
AVA reads from the systems your analysts already trust. No rip-and-replace, no new SIEM.
Every alert investigated, every investigation compounding. Send us one sanitised alert; we send back a full Investigation Report in 48 hours — verdict, evidence chain, audit trail, the report your team would defend.